Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +3712%
7.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Feb 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
3584
Shading Units
72
224
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT215
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy