AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages

Lower TDP (275W vs 350W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock1665MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (912.4GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

6656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY

7.168 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +375%

34.1 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY

4736

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +317%

19794

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY

25

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +268%

92

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY

55

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +178%

153

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY

70

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +184%

199

GTA 5 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY

44

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +127%

100

GTA 5 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY

52

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +188%

150

GTA 5 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY

144

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +29%

186

Radeon R9 FURY

VS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Graphics Card

Jul 2015

Release Date

May 2021

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1365 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

912.4GB/s

Render Config

56

Compute Units

-

SM Count

80

3584

Shading Units

10240

224

TMUs

320

64

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

320

-

RT Cores

80

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

186.5 GPixel/s

224.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

532.8 GTexel/s

7.168 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

34.10 TFLOPS

7.168 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

34.10 TFLOPS

448.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

350W

600 W

Suggested PSU

750 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GA102

Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)

GPU Variant

GA102-225-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

8 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

28.3 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA NVS 315

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon RX 560

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon R7 350

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU