Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +263%
7.168 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Dec 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
896
224
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Bonaire
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy