Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro RG220

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +10652%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
M93
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy