Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +13340%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV620
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy