CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+3484%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
G92B
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon 550
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy