AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)

1280 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages

Boost Clock1076MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +41%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

6.06 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce GTX 980 Ti +11%

5754

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +25%

30

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

24

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +44%

65

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

45

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X +6%

80

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

75

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Jun 2015

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1000 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1076 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1753 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.6GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2816

256

TMUs

176

64

ROPs

96

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

103.3 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

189.4 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.060 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

250W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GM200

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GM200-310-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

28 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

8 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

5.2

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 470D

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

Related News

1

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

2

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

3

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

4

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

5

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

6

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

7

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

8

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

9

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

10

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage