AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

2176 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1680MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (160W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +33%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2060

6.451 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 2060 +44%

7483

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +25%

30

GeForce RTX 2060

24

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +20%

65

GeForce RTX 2060

54

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 2060 +1%

81

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 2060

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Jan 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1365 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1680 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

30

4096

Shading Units

1920

256

TMUs

120

64

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

240

-

RT Cores

30

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

80.64 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

201.6 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

12.90 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.451 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

160W

600 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU106

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

TU106-200A-KA-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA NVS 300

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU