Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +41%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
28
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 33
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy