Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV380
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy