Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD FirePro M5950

AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M265X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock625MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M265X +14%
0.8 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

575 MHz
Base Clock
-
625 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
800.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
50.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Whistler
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy