Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +3975%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy