Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +689%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630M
0.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2012
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF108
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N13P-GL2-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy