Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1176MHz vs 975MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +32%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960M
1.505 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1097 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1176 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.82 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
47.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.505 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GM107
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N16P-GX-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy