Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X
2.961 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +317%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy