AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1266MHz vs 1021MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 100.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
1.568 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+272%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
Gem System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1021 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1568 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
100.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.34 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
49.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
1.568 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
98.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Strato
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Strato PRO
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
