Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1000MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385 +159%
1.792 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Opal
Strato XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy