Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1038MHz vs 1000MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385 +124%
1.792 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Gem System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
GP108B
Strato XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy