Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1680MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385
1.792 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +1724%
32.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
896
Shading Units
9728
56
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
AD103
Strato XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy