AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
+136%
7.066 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU104
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N18E-G2R
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
