Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +7497%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GT218
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy