Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +18515%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
G98
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy