Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6650M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2416MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650M +132%
8.659 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2068 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
28
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.6 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.32 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.659 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 23
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy