Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2090MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +934%
38.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4608
128
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
180W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 31
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Navi 31
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy