AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+319%
15.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
2048
Shading Units
4608
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
AD106
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
