Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +88%
8.192 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GA107
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
596 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy