CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+18104%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce 205 OEM
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
4
AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
7
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Related News
1
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
2
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
4
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
5
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
6
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
7
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
8
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
9
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
10
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy