Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 128MB VRAM GeForce 6200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.800GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2004
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 6 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
275 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.800GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
600.0 MPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.200 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
NV43
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy