AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+989%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1010
0.752 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano
+761%
4677
GeForce GT 1010
543
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R9 Nano
+1332%
2191
GeForce GT 1010
153
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
256
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.74 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.49 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
751.6 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GP108
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GP108-200-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
