CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+2016%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce GTS 250
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
G92B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 480
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA P106 100
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Related News
1
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
2
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
3
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
4
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
5
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
6
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
7
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
8
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
9
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
10
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy