Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +2016%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G92B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy