AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

2688 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1785MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano +62%

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

5.027 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +29%

5987

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano +7%

28

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

26

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +15%

60

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

52

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +5%

79

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Oct 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1530 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1785 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

22

4096

Shading Units

1408

256

TMUs

88

64

ROPs

48

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1536 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.05 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.027 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W

TDP

125W

450 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU116

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

TU116-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA T600

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA P106 100

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU