CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+1873%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
3
AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
6
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W5100
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
Related News
1
Complete Layout of Intel's Next-Gen LGA1851 Interface Exposed: A Comprehensive Look at PCIe and USB Features
2
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
3
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
4
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
5
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
6
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
7
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
8
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
9
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
10
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy