Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +474%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
1.425 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.85 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.39 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1425 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GK106
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GK106-220-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy