Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8670 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +916%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Oland
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy