CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8670 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+916%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Oland
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3650
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Related News
1
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
2
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
3
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
4
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
5
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
6
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
7
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
8
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
9
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
10
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy