CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+315%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Tobago
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W9100
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA PG506 232
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy