Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +315%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Tobago
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy