AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460
+179%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Arctic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
