AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460
+203%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Dec 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
GT200B
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
