Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX 470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 470 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 470 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 470 +821%
4.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

926 MHz
Base Clock
-
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
211.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2048
Shading Units
216
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200
Polaris 10 PRO (215-0876204)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy