Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1455MHz vs 1445MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300M
4.069 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +119%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1445 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1408
Shading Units
3072
88
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
127.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
8.138 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
4.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
254.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
AD107
Navi 14 XLM
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy