Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 550 vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon RX 550 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 550 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 550 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 550
1.211 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +53%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cayman
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy