AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

VS

AMD Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages

More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)

256 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1518MHz vs 1275MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon RX 560 +11%

2.611 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

2.332 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon RX 560

3

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +233%

10

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon RX 560

12

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +66%

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon RX 560

21

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +47%

31

Battlefield 5 2160p

Radeon RX 560

11

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +45%

16

Battlefield 5 1440p

Radeon RX 560 +6%

32

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

30

Battlefield 5 1080p

Radeon RX 560 +5%

40

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

38

GTA 5 1080p

Radeon RX 560 +2%

94

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

92

Radeon RX 560

VS

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Graphics Card

Apr 2017

Release Date

May 2018

Polaris

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1175 MHz

Base Clock

1392 MHz

1275 MHz

Boost Clock

1518 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1752 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

3GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

96bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

84.10GB/s

Render Config

16

Compute Units

-

SM Count

6

1024

Shading Units

768

64

TMUs

48

16

ROPs

24

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

768 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

20.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

36.43 GPixel/s

81.60 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

72.86 GTexel/s

2.611 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

36.43 GFLOPS

2.611 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.332 TFLOPS

163.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

72.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W

TDP

75W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21

GPU Name

GP107

Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)

GPU Variant

GP107-301-K1-A1

GCN 4.0

Architecture

Pascal

GlobalFoundries

Foundry

Samsung

14 nm

Process Size

14 nm

3 billion

Transistors

3.3 billion

123 mm²

Die Size

132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.1

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.4

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

2

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon RX 580G

3

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

4

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM

5

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB

6

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

7

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB

8

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT AGP

9

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon RX 570 X2

10

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU