Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6300 +213%
3.133 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x HDMI 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 24 XL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy