Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4640 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +3690%
23.65 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Feb 2012
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
480
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

335W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy