Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +6011%
23.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
128
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

335W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy