Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 7500 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2300MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7500 XT +1657%
9.421 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1452 MHz
Base Clock
-
2300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

73.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
147.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
18.84 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.421 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
294.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 33
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy