Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +165310%
64.51 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2009
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5376
Shading Units
16
336
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy