Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 285% (3000MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +12827%
64.51 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Navi III
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
320
336
TMUs
20
192
ROPs
8
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy