Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 355W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +13507%
81.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
3300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
384
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
28
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

633.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1267 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
162.2 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

355W
TDP
289W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 31 XTX+
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy