Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs Intel Arc A350

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2000MHz vs 1546MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +312%
12.66 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Vega
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
DG2-128
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy