Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +8753%
12.66 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
Vega
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV630
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy